Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 41
Filter
2.
Washington; Organización Panamericana de la Salud; abr. 7, 2021. 5 p.
Non-conventional in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1177307

ABSTRACT

En las campañas de vacunación, como en la actual situación de COVID-19, es habitual que los países señalen posibles efectos adversos después de la vacunación. Esto no significa necesariamente que los eventos estén relacionados con la vacunación en sí, pero es necesario investigarlos. También muestra que el sistema de vigilancia funciona y que existen controles efectivos. La Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) está en contacto regular con la Agencia Europea de Medicamentos (EMA) y otras autoridades reguladoras del mundo para obtener la información más reciente sobre la seguridad de todas las vacunas para COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Viral Vaccines/adverse effects , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis/chemically induced , Pandemics/prevention & control , Betacoronavirus/immunology , Drug Monitoring/adverse effects , Immunization Programs/organization & administration , Europe
3.
Washington; Organización Panamericana de la Salud; mar. 02, 2021. 28 p. ilus.
Non-conventional in English, Spanish, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1150961

ABSTRACT

Todos os países do mundo formularam planos de resposta para enfrentar a pandemia da COVID-19. No entanto, os desafios impostos pela doença os obrigam a aprender e adaptar-se constantemente. Cada vez mais é necessário reforçar o componente de comunicação de riscos como uma ferramenta essencial para transmitir à população, da devida forma, todas as informações sobre o processo de imunização, desde os testes clínicos e a produção de novas vacinas, até a adoção, distribuição e priorização dos grupos aos quais serão administradas uma ou mais vacinas ­ dependendo da definição e disponibilidade de cada país ­, bem como sobre o acesso universal às vacinas, após os grupos prioritários terem sido imunizados. A Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde, em seu esforço constante e permanente para apoiar os países das Américas, apresenta este documento para facilitar a formulação de uma estratégia de comunicação de riscos e participação comunitária (CRPC) para a vacinação contra o SARS-CoV-2. O intuito é contribuir para o fortalecimento das capacidades de comunicação e planejamento dos ministérios e secretarias de saúde, bem como de outros órgãos responsáveis pela comunicação na área das novas vacinas contra a COVID-19 nas Américas.


Todos los países del mundo han desarrollado planes de respuesta para enfrentar la pandemia de COVID-19; sin embargo, los desafíos que presenta la enfermedad los obliga a un aprendizaje y a una adaptación constantes. Cada vez es más necesario reforzar el componente de comunicación de riesgos como herramienta esencial para transmitir de forma adecuada a la población toda la información sobre el proceso de inmunización, desde los ensayos clínicos y la producción de nuevas vacunas, hasta la introducción, distribución y priorización de grupos a los que hay que administrar una o varias vacunas ­según la definición y la disponibilidad de cada país­ así como el acceso universal a ellas, una vez inmunizados los grupos prioritarios. La OPS, dentro de su empeño constante por apoyar a los países de las Américas, publica el presente documento con ánimo de facilitar la elaboración de una estrategia de comunicación de riesgos y participación comunitaria para la vacunación contra la COVID-19. Su finalidad es contribuir a fortalecer las capacidades y la planificación de la comunicación de los ministerios o secretarías de salud, así como de otros organismos encargados de comunicar en el área de las nuevas vacunas contra la COVID-19 en las Américas.


All countries around the world have developed response plans to tackle the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the challenges presented by the disease require constant learning and adaptation. It is increasingly necessary to strengthen the risk communication component as an essential tool for providing the population with all of the necessary information about the immunization process. This ranges from clinical trials and the production of new vaccines to the introduction, distribution, and prioritization of groups that need one or more vaccines­according to each country's definitions and vaccine availability. It also includes universal access to vaccines, once the priority groups have been immunized. PAHO, in its constant, ongoing effort to support the countries of the Americas, is making this document available to facilitate the preparation of a risk communication and community engagement strategy for vaccination against COVID-19. Its goal is to help to strengthen the communication and planning capacities of the ministries or secretariats of health and other agencies in charge of communicating about new COVID-19 vaccines in the Americas.


Subject(s)
Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Viral Vaccines/immunology , Immunization Programs/organization & administration , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Health Communication , Pandemics/prevention & control , Betacoronavirus/immunology
4.
Washington; Organización Panamericana de la Salud; feb. 22, 2021. 14 p.
Non-conventional in English, Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1150948

ABSTRACT

El propósito de estas orientaciones es apoyar el desarrollo de un sistema regional de vigilancia de ESAVI y AESI sensible, oportuno, estandarizado, confiable e integrado, con la participación de todos los actores involucrados en la vacunación segura, con vistas a mantener la confianza en la vacunación y la aceptación de la inmunización en las Américas. El sistema contribuirá a la detección temprana y a la clasificación adecuada de los ESAVI graves y de las señales de riesgo, para generar una respuesta rápida y apropiada a nivel nacional y regional.


The purpose of tthis guidance document is to develop a sensitive, timely, standardized, reliable, and integrated regional AEFI surveillance system with the participation of all actors involved in safe vaccination to maintain trust in vaccination and acceptance of immunization in the Americas. Contribute to the early detection and correct classification of serious AEFIs and risk markers to generate a rapid and appropriate national and regional response.


Subject(s)
Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Viral Vaccines/immunology , Immunization Programs/organization & administration , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Betacoronavirus/immunology
5.
Washington; Organización Panamericana de la Salud; feb. 06, 2021. 12 p. tab..
Non-conventional in English, Spanish, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1150955

ABSTRACT

Los interrogantes sobre la eficacia y la seguridad de las vacunas se encuentran entre las preguntas relacionadas con la vacunación que más a menudo se plantean. Esta tercera edición de Preguntas frecuentes sobre las vacunas experimentales contra la COVID-19 y los mecanismos de acceso ofrece respuestas a estas y otras preguntas. Asimismo, el documento explica las diferentes fases por las que pasa una vacuna antes de obtener aprobación y facilita información sobre las vacunas experimentales y la vacunación contra la COVID-19.


Will COVID-19 vaccines be safe? Will all the COVID-19 candidate vaccines be successful? What are the different phases a vaccine must go through to be approved? This document provides responses to the most frequently asked questions about candidate vaccines and access to COVID-19 vaccination.


Existe uma vacina contra a COVID-19? Todas as vacinas candidatas contra a COVID-19 serão bem-sucedidas? Quais são as diferentes fases que uma vacina deve passar para ser aprovada? Este documento responde às perguntas mais frequentes sbre as vacinas experimentais e os mecanismos de acesso disponíveis em cada país.


Subject(s)
Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Viral Vaccines/immunology , Immunization Programs/organization & administration , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Betacoronavirus/immunology
6.
Washington; Organización Panamericana de la Salud; feb. 11, 2021. 38 p. ilus..
Non-conventional in English, Spanish, Portuguese, French | LILACS | ID: biblio-1150956

ABSTRACT

El Grupo Técnico Asesor (GTA) sobre Enfermedades Prevenibles por Vacunación de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS) celebró su sexta reunión ad hoc de manera virtual el 16 de noviembre del 2020, para dar seguimiento a la última reunión ad hoc celebrada tres meses antes de manera virtual sobre la pandemia de COVID-19. Los objetivos específicos de la reunión fueron proporcionar una actualización sobre la situación epidemiológica relacionada con la COVID-19 y su repercusión sobre los programas nacionales de inmunización en la Región de las Américas; examinar las recomendaciones del Grupo de Expertos en Asesoramiento Estratégico sobre Inmunización (SAGE) de la OMS con respecto al marco de valores y la hoja de ruta para la asignación de prioridades para la vacunación contra la COVID-19 en un contexto de suministros limitados; poner al corriente a los participantes de los progresos logrados mediante los componentes de la planificación para la introducción de las vacunas contra la COVID-19, y tratar las actividades clave prioritarias para apoyar a los países de la Región.


PAHO's Technical Advisory Group (TAG) on Vaccine-preventable Diseases held its sixth ad-hoc virtual meeting on 16 November 2020, to follow-up on the last ad-hoc virtual meeting held 3 months prior on the COVID-19 pandemic. The specific objectives of the meeting were to provide an epidemiological update on COVID-19 and its impact on national immunization programs (NIPs) in the Americas; review recommendations from WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on immunization regarding the value framework and roadmap for prioritizing the use of COVID-19 vaccines in the context of limited supply; update participants on the progress made through planning components for the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines; and discuss key priority activities to support countries in the Region.


O Grupo Técnico Assessor (GTA) da OPAS em Doenças Imunopreveníveis realizou sua sexta reunião ad hoc virtual em 16 de novembro de 2020 em prosseguimento à reunião anterior sobre a pandemia de COVID-19 realizada havia 3 meses. A reunião teve como objetivos específicos: apresentar uma atualização epidemiológica da COVID-19 e seu impacto nos programas nacionais de imunizações nas Américas; examinar as recomendações do Grupo Consultivo Estratégico de Especialistas em Imunização (SAGE) da OMS em imunização do modelo de valores e guia para priorização do uso das vacinas contra COVID-19 diante do suprimento limitado; informar aos participantes o progresso obtido nos componentes do planejamento para a introdução das vacinas e debater as medidas prioritárias de apoio aos países na Região.


Le Groupe consultatif technique (GCT) de l'OPS sur les maladies évitables par la vaccination a tenu sa sixième réunion virtuelle spéciale le 16 novembre 2020 pour donner suite à la dernière réunion virtuelle spéciale tenue trois mois avant la pandémie de COVID-19. Les objectifs propres à cette réunion étaient de fournir une mise à jour épidémiologique concernant la COVID-19 et ses répercussions sur les programmes nationaux de vaccination dans les Amériques, d'examiner les recommandations du Groupe consultatif stratégique d'experts (SAGE) de l'OMS sur la vaccination relativement au cadre de valeurs et à la feuille de route visant à définir des groupes prioritaires pour l'utilisation des vaccins anti-COVID-19 dans un contexte d'offre limitée, d'informer les participants sur les derniers progrès réalisés via des éléments de planification de l'introduction des vaccins anti-COVID-19 et de discuter des principales activités prioritaires pour soutenir les pays de la Région.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Immunization Programs/organization & administration , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Epidemiological Monitoring , Betacoronavirus/immunology , Pan American Health Organization/organization & administration
7.
Ciudad de Guatemala; s.n; 5 feb. 2021. 35 p. tab, ilus.
Non-conventional in Spanish | LILACS, LIGCSA | ID: biblio-1179867

ABSTRACT

Para facilitar la introducción de la vacuna contra la COVID-19 el Ministerio de Salud Pblica y Asistencia Social (MSPAS) estableció el Comité Nacional de Coordinación para Vacunación contra COVID-19 (CNVCOVID) a través del Acuerdo Ministerial No 0262-2020, con la finalidad de desarrollar e implementar el plan estratégico nacional de vacunación contra la COVID-19. Este documento representa ese producto, en el cual se integran y describen los componentes esenciales para el despliegue de la vacunación contra la COVID-19 el cual se actualizará periódicamente, a medida que se obtenga información actualizada, científica, legal y técnico-operativa para fortalecer la estrategia de vacunación contra la COVID-19 en Guatemala


Subject(s)
Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Viral Vaccines/supply & distribution , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/immunology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Health Policy , Viral Vaccines/standards , Guatemala
8.
Washington; Organización Panamericana de la Salud; ene. 19, 2021. 4 p.
Non-conventional in English, Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1150953

ABSTRACT

Como trabajador de salud, ¿cuál es mi función en la introducción de las vacunas contra la COVID-19? ¿Cómo debo responder si los pacientes me hacen preguntas sobre las vacunas contra la COVID­19? Este documento está dirigido a los trabajadores y trabajadoras de salud que participen en los programas de vacunación contra la COVID-19 y ofrece respuestas a las preguntas más frecuentes sobre las vacunas contra la enfermedad.


As a healthcare worker, what is my role in COVID-19 vaccine introduction? How should I respond if people ask me questions about COVID-19 vaccines? This document is addressed to healthcare workers involved in the COVID-19 immunization program and contains answers to the most common questions about COVID-19 vaccines.


Subject(s)
Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Viral Vaccines/immunology , Health Personnel/education , Immunization Programs/organization & administration , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Betacoronavirus/immunology
9.
Rev. Paul. Pediatr. (Ed. Port., Online) ; 39: e2020217, 2021. tab, graf
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS, SES-SP | ID: biblio-1136769

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the current scientific literature to document, in an integrative review, the main findings that correlate Kawasaki disease (KD) to COVID-19. Data sources: The search was carried out in June 2020 in the following databases: Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS), periódico da CAPES and U.S National Library of Medicine (PubMed). The combination of descriptors used was [(COVID-19 OR SARS-CoV-2) AND (Kawasaki disease)], and the inclusion criteria stipulated were studies published from January 2019 to June 2020, without restriction of language or location, and available online in full. News, editorials, comments, and letters, as well as duplicates and articles that did not answer the guiding question were excluded. Data synthesis: A total of 97 articles were identified, of which seven comprised this review. The association of KD to the new coronavirus appears to trigger a severe clinical condition of vasculitis. Different from the usual, in this inflammatory syndrome, patients are older, and prevalence is higher in children from African or Caribbean ancestry; clinical and laboratory manifestations are also atypical, with a predominance of abdominal complaints and exaggerated elevation of inflammatory markers. In addition, there was a greater report of rare complications and greater resistance to the recommended treatment for KD. Conclusions: Pediatric COVID-19 and its potential association to severe KD, still unfamiliar to health professionals, reinforces the importance of testing patients with vasculitis for the new coronavirus and the need to wage high surveillance and preparation of the health system during the current pandemic.


RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar a literatura científica atual a fim de documentar, por meio de revisão integrativa, os principais achados que associam a doença de Kawasaki (DK) à doença do coronavírus (COVID-19). Fonte de dados: A busca ocorreu em junho de 2020, nas bases de dados: Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS), periódico da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) e U.S. National Library of Medicine (PubMed). Os descritores utilizados foram [(COVID-19 OR SARS-CoV-2) AND (Kawasaki Disease)], e os critérios de inclusão estipulados compreenderam estudos publicados de janeiro de 2019 a junho de 2020, sem restrição de idioma ou localização e disponíveis online integralmente. Foram excluídos notícias, editoriais, comentários e cartas de apresentação, assim como duplicatas e artigos que não respondiam à pergunta norteadora. Síntese dos dados: Identificaram-se 97 artigos, dos quais sete compuseram esta revisão. A associação da DK com o novo coronavírus parece desencadear um quadro de vasculite grave. Diferentemente do usual, nessa síndrome inflamatória, os pacientes são mais velhos e a descendência prevalente é africana ou caribenha; as manifestações clínicas e laboratoriais também são atípicas, com predomínio de queixas abdominais e elevação exagerada de marcadores inflamatórios. Além disso, houve maior relato de complicações raras e maior resistência ao tratamento preconizado para DK. Conclusões: A COVID-19 pediátrica e sua potencial associação com uma DK grave, ainda pouco conhecida pelos profissionais da saúde, reforçam a importância da testagem de pacientes com vasculite para o novo coronavírus e a necessidade de empreender alta vigilância e preparação do sistema de saúde durante a atual pandemia.


Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/virology , Pandemics , Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome/therapy , Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome/epidemiology , Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome/virology , Disease Management , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19
12.
Rev. Hosp. Ital. B. Aires (2004) ; 40(4): 233-236, dic. 2020. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1145604

ABSTRACT

Entre el 1 y el 26 de junio se llevó a cabo el estudio de investigación "Encuesta de infección por coronavirus tipo 2 del síndrome respiratorio agudo grave (SARS-CoV-2), nivel comunitario en habitantes de un barrio vulnerable urbano de la ciudad de Buenos Aires", que determinó que un 54,3% de los habitantes del barrio presentaban anticuerpos inmunoglobulina tipo G para SARS-CoV-2. El objetivo de este artículo es proporcionar un ejemplo de un muestreo probabilístico que fue utilizado para estimar la prevalencia de seropositividad en este estudio. (AU)


Between 1st and 26th of june, a research named "Survey of infection by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), community level in inhabitants of a marginal urban neighborhood of the city of Buenos Aires" was carried on. The study showed that 54.3% of the that 54.3% of the people of the neighborhood had antibodies immunoglobulin type G for SARS-CoV-2. The objective of this article is to provide an example of a probability sampling carried out in the study, to measuring the prevalence of seropositivity. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Health Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Argentina , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Simple Random Sampling , Prevalence , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Betacoronavirus/immunology
13.
Bol. méd. Hosp. Infant. Méx ; 77(5): 252-261, Sep.-Oct. 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1131986

ABSTRACT

Abstract Since the emergence of the new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in China at the end of 2019, when its characteristics were practically unknown, one aspect was evident: its high contagion rate. This high infection rate resulted in the spread of the virus in China, Europe, and, eventually, the rest of the world, including Mexico. At present, around 9 million people are infected, and around 470,000 have died worldwide. In this context, the need to generate protective immunity, and especially the generation of a vaccine that can protect the world population against infection in the shortest possible time, is a challenge that is being addressed in different countries using different strategies in multiple clinical trials. This opinion article will present the evidence of the induction of immune response in some of the viruses of the coronavirus family before COVID-19, such as SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV (Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus). The information collected about the induction of an immune response by SARS-CoV-2 will be presented, as well as a description of the vaccine candidates reported to date in the various ongoing clinical trials. Finally, an opinion based on the evidence presented will be issued on the potential success of developing vaccine prototypes.


Resumen Desde el surgimiento del nuevo coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus tipo 2 del síndrome respiratorio agudo severo) en China a finales del año 2019, cuando todavía era desconocido prácticamente en todos los aspectos, una característica era evidente: el alto índice de contagio entre la población. Esto resultó en la expansión del virus en China, Europa y, finalmente, en el resto del mundo, incluyendo México. Actualmente, alrededor de 9 millones de personas están infectadas, y han muerto cerca de 500,000 en todo el mundo. En este contexto, la necesidad de generar inmunidad protectora y, sobre todo, el desarrollo de una vacuna que pueda proteger a la población mundial contra la infección en el menor tiempo posible, es un reto que se está abordando en distintos países utilizando diversas estrategias en múltiples ensayos clínicos. En este artículo de opinión se presentan las evidencias de la inducción de respuesta inmunitaria con algunos de los virus de la familia de coronavirus previos al SARS-CoV-2, como el SARS-CoV (coronavirus del síndrome respiratorio agudo severo) y el MERS-CoV (síndrome respiratorio por coronavirus de Oriente Medio). Además, se presenta lo reportado hasta el momento acerca de la inducción de respuesta inmunitaria por el SARS-CoV-2, así como una descripción de los candidatos a vacunas informados hasta el momento en los distintos ensayos clínicos en curso. Finalmente se emite una opinión, basada en las evidencias presentadas, acerca del éxito potencial de los prototipos de vacunas en desarrollo.


Subject(s)
Animals , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Viral Vaccines , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Betacoronavirus/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/immunology , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/prevention & control , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/isolation & purification , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/immunology , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus/isolation & purification , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus/immunology , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 Vaccines , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273
14.
Bol. méd. Hosp. Infant. Méx ; 77(5): 262-273, Sep.-Oct. 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1131987

ABSTRACT

Abstract Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and Alphainfluenzavirus are RNA viruses that cause coronavirus disease-19 and influenza, respectively. Both viruses infect the respiratory tract, show similar symptoms, and use surface proteins to infect the host. Influenza requires hemagglutinin and neuraminidase to infect, whereas SARS-CoV-2 uses protein S. Both viruses depend on a viral RNA polymerase to express their proteins, but only SARS-CoV-2 has a proofreading mechanism, which results in a low mutation rate compared to influenza. E1KC4 and camostat mesylate are potential inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 S protein, achieving an effect similar to oseltamivir. Due to the SARS-CoV-2 low mutation rate, nucleoside analogs have been developed (such as EIDD-2801), which insert lethal mutations in the viral RNA. Furthermore, the SARS-CoV-2 low mutation rate suggests that a vaccine, as well as the immunity developed in recovered patients, could provide long-lasting protection compared to vaccines against influenza, which are rendered obsolete as the virus mutates.


Resumen La enfermedad por coronavirus de 2019 y la influenza son causadas por virus ARN: coronavirus tipo 2 del síndrome respiratorio agudo grave (SARS-CoV-2) y Alphainfluenzavirus, respectivamente. Ambos virus infectan el tracto respiratorio, presentan síntomas similares y emplean proteínas de superficie para infectar al huésped. El virus de la influenza requiere de hemaglutinina y neuraminidasa para infectar, mientras que el SARS-CoV-2 utiliza la proteína S. Ambos virus dependen de la ARN polimerasa viral para expresar sus proteínas, pero solo el SARS-CoV-2 cuenta con un mecanismo de corrección de errores, por lo que presenta una baja tasa de mutaciones en comparación con el virus de la influenza. E1KC4 y el mesilato de camostat son inhibidores potenciales de la proteína S del SARS-CoV-2, obteniendo un efecto similar al de oseltamivir. Aprovechando la baja tasa de mutación del SARS-CoV-2, se han desarrollado análogos de nucleósidos (como el fármaco EIDD-2801) que insertan mutaciones letales en el ARN viral. Además, la baja tasa de mutación del SARS-CoV-2, obteniendo un efecto similar al de oseltamivir sugiere que las vacunas desarrolladas, así como la inmunidad generada en pacientes recuperados, podrían brindar protección prolongada, en comparación con las vacunas desarrolladas contra la influenza, que resultan obsoletas frente a una cepa mutada.


Subject(s)
Animals , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Influenza, Human/virology , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Influenza A virus/isolation & purification , Influenza A virus/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Viral Vaccines , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Influenza, Human/immunology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Betacoronavirus/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 , Mutation
15.
Actual. osteol ; 16(2): [116]-[131], mayo.-ago. 2020. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1129745

ABSTRACT

"Los coronavirus pertenecen a una gran familia de virus (Coronaviridae) que infectan aves y varios mamíferos. El coronavirus actualmente denominado SARS-CoV-2, fue descubierto en diciembre de 2019 en Wuhan, provincia de Hubei, China, y es el agente causal de la epidemia de neumonía atípica actual" (COVID-19; Coronavirus Disease 2019). Los casos más graves presentan un síndrome de dificultad respiratoria aguda que puede conducir a la muerte. La vitamina D (VD), además del efecto bien conocido y positivo sobre la salud ósea y la homeostasis del calcio, tiene efecto pleiotrópico en varios órganos, con distribución casi universal del receptor de VD y de las enzimas de metabolización de 25 hidroxivitamina D (25OHD) en las células del organismo. Estas acciones extraesqueléticas dependen de la síntesis en dichas células del metabolito activo 1,25 dihidroxivitamina D por regulación paracrina y autocrina, dependiente de niveles circulantes óptimos de 25OHD. Por sus acciones inmunomoduladora, antiinflamatoria, antimicrobiana, reguladora del sistema renina-angiotensina-aldosterona, favorecedora de la indemnidad del epitelio respiratorio y la homeostasis redox celular, la VD podría tener efecto protector en la infección por COVID-19. Entre los grupos de riesgo para COVID-19 figuran los adultos mayores, obesos, diabéticos, hipertensos, con afecciones cardiovasculares, patologías con mayor incidencia en individuos con hipovitaminosis VD. La suplementación con VD, para alcanzar niveles óptimos de 25OHD de 40-60 ng/ml, podría reducir la incidencia, severidad y riesgo de muerte en la actual pandemia por COVID-19, como medida complementaria mientras se desarrollan la vacuna y otras medicaciones específicas. (AU)


Coronaviruses belong to a large family of viruses (Coronaviridae) that infect birds and various mammals. The novel coronavirus currently known as SARS-CoV-2 was discovered in December 2019 in Wuhan, Hubei province, China and is the causal agent of the current atypical pneumonia epidemic (COVID-19: Coronavirus Disease 2019); The most severe cases present with acute respiratory distress syndrome that can lead to death. Vitamin D (VD) has a pleiotropic effect on several organs, in addition to its wellknown and positive effect on bone health and calcium homeostasis, with an almost universal distribution of the VD receptor and the metabolites of 25hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) in all cells of the body. These extra-skeletal actions depend on the synthesis of the active metabolite 1,25dihydroxyvitamin D in the cells depending on the optimal circulating levels of 25OHD and though paracrine and autocrine regulation. Due to its immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and regulatory actions on the renin angiotensin aldosterone system, which favors the compensation of the respiratory epithelium and cellular redox homeostasis, the VD could have a protective effect on COVID-19 infection. Among the risk groups for COVID-19 are obese, diabetic, and hypertensive patients, subjects with cardiovascular conditions, and elderly people. All these pathologies show a higher incidence in individuals with VD hypovitaminosis. VD supplementation, to achieve optimal 25OHD levels of 40-60 ng/ml, could reduce the incidence, severity, and risk of death in the current COVID-19 pandemic, as a complementary measure while the vaccine and other specific therapies are being developed. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Vitamin D/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Vitamin D/administration & dosage , Vitamin D/biosynthesis , Vitamin D/physiology , Vitamin D/therapeutic use , Vitamin D Deficiency/complications , Calcifediol/biosynthesis , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Pandemics , Betacoronavirus
16.
Rev. peru. med. exp. salud publica ; 37(2): 203-209, abr.-jun. 2020. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1127128

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Objetivos: Determinar el rendimiento diagnóstico adicional de una prueba serológica rápida que detecta anticuerpos IgM e IgG contra SARS-CoV-2 en relación a la reacción en cadena de polimerasa reversa en tiempo real (RT-PCR). Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio transversal incluyendo pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19 en tres hospitales, trabajadores de salud expuestos a la infección y pacientes ambulatorios que cumplían criterios de caso sospechoso, a quienes se les realizó la prueba molecular (RT-PCR) y la prueba serológica rápida. Se evaluó el rendimiento diagnóstico adicional de las prueba serológica rápida en relación a la molecular. Asimismo, se realizó la estimación de sensibilidad y especificidad de dichas pruebas. Resultados: Se incluyeron 144 personas. La prueba serológica rápida obtuvo un 19,4% de resultados positivos en comparación con un 11,1% en la prueba molecular (p=0,03). La prueba serológica rápida detectó 21 casos que habían resultado negativos por el RT-PCR inicial y el rendimiento diagnóstico adicional fue de 56,8% en comparación al RT-PCR. El rendimiento diagnóstico adicional fue 50,0% durante la primera semana, 70,0% durante la segunda y 50,0% durante la tercera semana de inicio de síntomas. La sensibilidad de la prueba serológica rápida fue de 43,8% y la especificidad del 98,9%. Conclusiones: La prueba serológica rápida logró detectar un mayor número de casos respecto a la molecular, sobre todo a partir de la segunda semana de inicio de síntomas. Además, presentó una alta especificidad. Los resultados mostrarían su utilidad como prueba complementaria a la prueba molecular, especialmente durante la segunda y tercera semana de enfermedad.


ABSTRACT Objective: To determine the additional diagnostic performance of a rapid serological test for detection of IgM and IgG antibodies compared to the real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test; for detection of SARS-CoV-2. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out including patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in 3 hospitals, health workers exposed to the infection and outpatients who met suspicious case criteria, all of which underwent the molecular test (RT-PCR) and the rapid serological test. The additional diagnostic performance of rapid serological test was evaluated in comparison to molecular tests. Likewise, an approximation was made to the sensitivity and specificity of the rapid serological test. Results: 144 people were included. With the rapid test, 19.4% of positive results were obtained compared to 11.1% in the molecular test (p = 0.03). The rapid serological test detected 21 cases that had been negative by the initial (RT-PCR), providing an additional diagnostic performance of 56.8% compared to the RT-PCR. The additional diagnostic performance was 50.0% during the first week, 70.0% during the second week and 50.0% during the third week of symptom onset. The sensitivity of the rapid serological test was 43.8% and the specificity of 98.9%. Conclusions: The rapid serological test was able to detect a greater number of cases than those detected by the molecular test especially after the second week of onset of symptoms. It also showed high specificity. It is therefore useful as a complementary test to RT-PCR, especially during the second and third week of illness.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Immunoglobulin G , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , SARS-CoV-2 , Antibodies , Outpatients , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Serologic Tests/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Pandemics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19
17.
Rev. peru. med. exp. salud publica ; 37(2): 312-319, abr.-jun. 2020. graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1127151

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN La enfermedad causada por el nuevo coronavirus (COVID-19) se caracteriza por presentar fiebre y tos, afectar el tracto respiratorio inferior y estar asociada con la edad, comorbilidades y un sistema inmune debilitado. Típicamente se ha evidenciado linfopenias en los casos graves y una desmedida producción de citocinas inflamatorias (tormenta de citocinas), lo que explicaría el rol de la respuesta hiperinflamatoria en la patogénesis de la COVID-19. Las respuestas inflamatorias secundarias por reinfecciones del virus podrían inducir el aumento o la mejora dependiente de anticuerpos (ADE, por sus siglas en inglés), un fenómeno virémico que podría ser un mecanismo alternativo de infección celular y que se deberá tener en cuenta cuando se diseñen vacunas o inmunoterapias que involucren el estímulo de anticuerpos neutralizantes o el uso de anticuerpos monoclonales. Actualmente no existen vacunas ni tratamientos que demuestren seguridad y eficacia en pacientes con COVID-19; sin embargo, se espera la conclusión de los resultados de la aplicación de una vacuna de ácidos nucleicos ARNm (mensajero del ácido ribonucleico) y de un fármaco antiviral (remdisivir) que se encuentran en ensayos clínicos fase III. Por el momento la mejor medida para evitar la propagación de la infección es el aislamiento social exhaustivo y viene siendo adoptado por varios países según recomendación de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS).


ABSTRACT Disease caused by the new coronavirus (COVID-19) is characterized by fever, cough, and affection of the lower respiratory tract. It is associated with age, comorbidities and a weakened immune system. Typically, lymphopenias have been evidenced in severe cases and an excessive production of inflammatory cytokines (cytokine storm), which would explain the role of the hyperinflammatory response in the pathogenesis of COVID-19. Secondary inflammatory responses from virus reinfections may induce antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), a viremic phenomenon that may be an alternative mechanism of cellular infection and should be considered when designing vaccines or immunotherapies involving the stimulation of neutralizing antibodies or the use of monoclonal antibodies. Currently, no vaccines or treatments demonstrate safety and efficacy in patients with COVID-19. However, the results from phase III clinical trials which involve the application of an mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid) nucleic acid vaccine and an antiviral drug (remdisivir), are yet to be concluded. For the time being, the best measure to prevent the spread of COVID-19 is by implementing social isolation, this measure has been adopted by several countries as recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO).


Subject(s)
Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Social Isolation , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Viral Vaccines/administration & dosage , Risk Factors , Cytokines/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Pandemics/prevention & control , COVID-19
19.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992) ; 66(6): 746-751, June 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | SES-SP, LILACS | ID: biblio-1136276

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE The present study aimed to investigate the role of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), an inflammation marker, complete blood count, and biochemical parameters in the diagnosis of COVID-19. METHODS A total of 80 patients who had been hospitalized in the internal medicine clinic were enrolled in the study. The cases were allocated into two groups, i.e., COVID (+) and (-), based on real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. The demographic, clinical, and laboratory [NLR, platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), complete blood count, biochemistry, and serology] data of the patients were retrospectively obtained from the hospital data management system. RESULTS NLR and fever levels were found to be higher in COVID-19 (+) cases (P=0.021, P=0.001, respectively). There was no difference between males and females with regard to COVID-19 positivity (P=0.527). Total bilirubin levels were found to be lower in COVID-19 (+) cases (P=0.040). When the ROC analysis was carried out for NLR in COVID-19 (+) cases, the AUC value was found to be 0.660 (P=0.021), sensitivity as 69.01 %, specificity as 65.40 %, LR+: 1.98 and LR- : 0.48, PPV: 80.43, and NPV: 50.00, when the NLR was ≥2.4. The risk of COVID-19 was found to be 20.3-fold greater when NLR was ≥ 2.4 in the logistic regression (P=0.007). CONCLUSION NLR is an independent predictor for the diagnosis of COVID-19. We also found that fever and total bilirubin measurements could be useful for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in this population.


RESUMO OBJETIVO O objetivo do presente estudo foi investigar o papel da razão neutrófilos/linfócitos (RNL), um marcador de inflamação, hemograma completo e parâmetros bioquímicos no diagnóstico de COVID-19. MÉTODOS Um total de 80 pacientes internados na clínica médica foram incluídos no estudo. Os casos foram alocados em dois grupos, COVID (+) e (-), de acordo com a reação em cadeia da polimerase com transcrição reversa em tempo real. Os dados demográficos, clínicos e laboratoriais [NLR, relação plaquetas / linfócitos (PLR), hemograma completo, bioquímica e sorologia]) dos pacientes foram obtidos retrospectivamente no sistema de gerenciamento de dados hospitalares. RESULTADOS Os níveis de NLR e febre foram maiores nos casos de COVID-19 (+) (P = 0,021, P = 0,001,respectivamente). Não houve diferença entre homens e mulheres em relação à positividade para COVID-19 (P = 0,527). Os níveis totais de bilirrubina foram menores nos casos de COVID-19 (+) (P = 0,040). Quando a análise ROC foi realizada para NLR nos casos COVID-19 (+), o valor da AUC foi de 0,660 (P = 0,021), sensibilidade 69,01%, especificidade 65,40%, LR +: 1,98 e LR-: 0,48 , PPV: 80,43 e NPV: 50,00 quando o NLR era> 2,4. The risk of COVID-19 was found to be 20.3-fold greater when NLR was ≥ 2.4 in the logistic regression (P=0.007). CONCLUSÃO NLR é um preditor independente para o diagnóstico de COVID-19. Também concluímos que aferições de febre e bilirrubina total podem ser úteis para o diagnóstico de COVID-19 nesta população.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Lymphocytes , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus , Pandemics , Neutrophils , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Coronavirus Infections , Betacoronavirus
20.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 24(2): 180-187, Mar.-Apr. 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, ColecionaSUS | ID: biblio-1132429

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT The accuracy of commercially available tests for COVID-19 in Brazil remains unclear. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis to describe the accuracy of available tests to detect COVID-19 in Brazil. We searched at the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA) online platform to describe the pooled sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) for detection of IgM/IgG antibodies and for tests using naso/oropharyngeal swabs in the random-effects models. We identified 16 tests registered, mostly rapid-tests. Pooled diagnostic accuracy measures [95%CI] were: (i) for IgM antibodies Se = 82% [76-87]; Sp = 97% [96-98]; DOR = 168 [92-305] and SROC = 0.98 [0.96-0.99]; (ii) for IgG antibodies Se = 97% [90-99]; Sp = 98% [97-99]; DOR = 1994 [385-10334] and SROC = 0.99 [0.98-1.00]; and (iii) for detection of SARS-CoV-2 by antigen or molecular assays in naso/oropharyngeal swabs Se = 97% [85-99]; Sp = 99% [77-100]; DOR = 2649 [30-233056] and SROC = 0.99 [0.98-1.00]. These tests can be helpful for emergency testing during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. However, it is important to highlight the high rate of false negative results from tests which detect SARS-CoV-2 IgM antibodies in the initial course of the disease and the scarce evidence-based validation results published in Brazil. Future studies addressing the diagnostic performance of tests for COVID-19 in the Brazilian population are urgently needed.


Subject(s)
Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Betacoronavirus/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Oropharynx/virology , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Brazil/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Odds Ratio , Nasopharynx/virology , ROC Curve , Sensitivity and Specificity , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Pandemics , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 Testing , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL